Over to the FT for the awful truth. ‘Only 71 people have responded to a cross-Whitehall online consultation on the draft legislative programme.’ ‘Many of the 41 comments on the Cabinet Office website have little, if any, relevance to the proposed bills.’ ‘The Scottish Office website (sic – hastily deleted, I note) has received a total of “three substantive comments” on the draft programme.’ Whatever we’re doing, we simply aren’t doing it right.
Switch to Feedburner
If you read this blog via RSS feed, you need to change your settings.
Get the futureproof feed 
Puffbox
There's a website at puffbox.com which says a bit more about my professional activity, but to be honest, this blog will give you as good a picture as any.
Archives
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
Top Posts
- Send Gmail from your own domain name
- Free video of full NHL ice hockey games
- Browse Windows Mobile devices like a USB disk
- Tom Watson quits - but don't check his blog
- Brian, meet Ananova
- Sky News joins Facebook
- Quantel opens its doors
- School league table map mashup: a breakthrough for e-government
- WordPress to do 'proper' workflow
- Mayo/Steinberg's Power Of Information review
That sort of online consultation doesn’t deserve more response. It is dull, doesn’t outline who will read the comments, doesn’t encourage conversation, doesn’t allow more than 1,000 characters. Perhaps we should be surprised it got 41 responses.