<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Windows Live Writer sneaks into the office</title>
	<atom:link href="http://simondickson.wordpress.com/2007/09/12/windows-live-writer-sneaks-into-the-office/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://simondickson.wordpress.com/2007/09/12/windows-live-writer-sneaks-into-the-office/</link>
	<description>The former home of Simon's blog on news, politics and e-government. Now at puffbox.com.</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jul 2008 05:32:24 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dave Briggs</title>
		<link>http://simondickson.wordpress.com/2007/09/12/windows-live-writer-sneaks-into-the-office/#comment-24334</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Briggs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Sep 2007 09:25:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://simondickson.wordpress.com/2007/09/12/windows-live-writer-sneaks-into-the-office/#comment-24334</guid>
		<description>Doesn't Word 207 allow you to post direct to a blog? Am sure it does. When orgs and enterprises get round to upgrading to 2007, they'll have a blog editor waiting and ready to go.

Personally, I prefer BlogJet for offline blogging.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Doesn&#8217;t Word 207 allow you to post direct to a blog? Am sure it does. When orgs and enterprises get round to upgrading to 2007, they&#8217;ll have a blog editor waiting and ready to go.</p>
<p>Personally, I prefer BlogJet for offline blogging.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Kingery</title>
		<link>http://simondickson.wordpress.com/2007/09/12/windows-live-writer-sneaks-into-the-office/#comment-24138</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Kingery</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2007 04:45:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://simondickson.wordpress.com/2007/09/12/windows-live-writer-sneaks-into-the-office/#comment-24138</guid>
		<description>Hi, thanks for the link. You mentioned 'it’s a shame you have to actually install it properly first, before you go portable - but maybe that’s something that can be ironed out?'

I did it that way because I'm not sure the legalities of me packaging up the whole code together as a self contained app.

Hope you find it useful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, thanks for the link. You mentioned &#8216;it’s a shame you have to actually install it properly first, before you go portable - but maybe that’s something that can be ironed out?&#8217;</p>
<p>I did it that way because I&#8217;m not sure the legalities of me packaging up the whole code together as a self contained app.</p>
<p>Hope you find it useful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
